“Good always triumphs in the end” isn’t really provable or disprovable, since history doesn’t have an “end,” and people can pick whatever point they want to label as the “end” of a particular event.

But it sure sounds like… the sort of narrative that would be pushed by whoever wants us to think that the side who triumphed in a particular conflict MUST, by definition, be the Good Side.

And wants us not to think about how Evil starts every conflict at an advantage… since they have access to effective strategies that Good would consider off-limits due to being fucking evil.

…